General Agreement That

It is the successor to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which was part of the Agreement on Health Protection and Plant Protection (SPS). It contains the fundamental principle that its requirements must be based on sound scientific knowledge, essential to avoid barriers to unfavourable trade, and provides that codex Alimentarius standards are fully taken into account. The SPS agreement applies to all relevant measures that could affect international trade and prohibits measures with an inconsistent or disguised protectionist effect, unless they are reasonable and based on sound scientific evidence. Article 5 clarifies this issue by providing that health and plant health measures must be based on a risk assessment, taking into account, in particular, internationally recognized assessment and control techniques. HACCP is such a technique applicable in the area of food security [Annex A (3) point a) ]. The assertion that Article 24 could be used in this way has been criticized as unrealistic by Mark Carney, Liam Fox and others, as point 5c of the contract requires an agreement between the parties so that Article 5b can be useful, since there would be no agreement in the case of a non-agreement scenario. In addition, critics of the GATT 24 approach point out that services would not fall under such regulation. [28] [29] While certain areas of consumer rights are addressed by the legitimate objective of preserving public health and preventing deceptive practices, it is not clear to what extent consumers` right to information could be considered a legitimate objective in itself. It could be argued, however, that in some cases consumers must be informed of the processes and origin of a product in the interest of environmental protection, which is one of the legitimate objectives. It is also possible that measures that fall within the scope of the UNITED Nations Consumer Protection Guidelines (as they were expanded in 1999) may be considered a legitimate objective, but there is still no case law to confirm or deny it. In addition to facilitating applied tariff reductions, GATT`s contribution to trade liberalization includes «the commitment of extended-term tariff reductions (which became more sustainable in 1955), the definition of universality of non-discrimination through the treatment of the most favoured nation (MFN) and the status of domestic treatment, ensuring greater transparency in trade policies and creating a forum for negotiations and the peaceful settlement of bilateral disputes.

All of these have helped to streamline trade policy and reduce trade barriers and political uncertainty. [4] When the Dillon cycle went through the laborious process of collective bargaining by post, it became clear, well before the end of the cycle, that a more comprehensive approach was needed to address the challenges ahead following the creation of the European Economic Community (EEC) and EFTA, as well as the re-emergence of Europe as a major international distributor in general.

Comments are closed.