Philip Morris Master Settlement Agreement

The addition of subsequent participating producers meant that almost all cigarette manufacturers on the domestic market had signed the Multistate Settlement Agreement. Their addition was important. The majors were concerned that all cigarette manufacturers that were excluded from a transaction (non-participating producers or NPMs) would be free to increase their market share or enter the market at lower prices, which would radically alter the future profits of the majors and their ability to raise prices to pay for the comparison. Our study assessed the impact of the MSA and the four individual accounts on shareholder revenues, the operational performance of the defendant companies, the increase in exports, the impact on the market share of the original producers and advertising expenses. In November 1998, the Attorneys General of the other 46 states, as well as the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, concluded the Master Settlement Agreement with the four largest cigarette manufacturers in the United States. (Florida, Minnesota, Texas and Mississippi had already entered into individual agreements with the tobacco industry.) The four manufacturers – Philip Morris USA, R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Brown – Williamson Tobacco Corp. and Lorillard Tobacco Company – are designated in the MSA as the original participating manufacturers (OPMs). The main differences between global regulation and the MSA with respect to federal tobacco control policy have been related to the granting of the FDA`s explicit authority to regulate tobacco products and to support industry efforts to develop less hazardous products and play a role. In addition to codifying much of the FDA`s rules in force at the time, the global regime added the following requirements: FDA testing on tobacco smoke components (including nicotine) and authorization of tobacco health claims, new technologies that are supposed to reduce health risks, as well as tobacco and non-tobacco ingredients used in cigarettes.

Other requirements include provisions prohibiting tobacco manufacturers from making statements that minimize the health risks of tobacco, the introduction of tobacco contamination controls and the introduction of rules on the control and handling of tobacco products. The FDA was also authorized to establish, and ultimately require a nicotine salary that was not considered an addiction. This fact sheet answers several frequently asked questions about the largest civil dispute resolution in U.S. history, the Manufactured Tobacco Processing Agreement (MSA). Abstract On November 23, 1998, 46 states and six other U.S. courts concluded the largest civil trial in the country`s history. In the mid-1990s, the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) resolved disputes in more than 40 states against major U.S. cigarette manufacturers, including Philip Morris, R.J. Reynolds, Brown-Williamson and Lorillard, as well as tobacco industry trade associations and public relations firms. By signing the MSA, states dropped their complaints that the defendants had violated government laws on cartels and consumer protection for decades. In exchange, the companies agreed to pay billions of dollars to the states in annual increments and to change the way they promote and market their products. Since November 1998, some 25 other tobacco companies have signed the MSA and are also linked to its terms and conditions.

Companies that had decided not to join the MSA (non-participating producers or NPMs) were required to set aside funds in public trust accounts for future actions1,3 a provision to protect participating companies and to encourage producers to join the agreement.

Comments are closed.